And Away They Go...

Elite Jewish Democratic Donors Are Flocking to John McCain

The following comments are taken from the website: http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/11/hot-elite-jewish-democratic-donors-flocking-to-mccain/

From The Hill, “Jewish Dem donor joins McCain team“:

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is attracting elite Jewish Democratic donors who backed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and are concerned about Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) stance toward Israel, say McCain backers who are organizing the effort to court Democrats.

McCain has already had several fundraising events with Jewish Democrats in Washington and Florida, say his supporters. …

You see, Senator Obama, that’s what happens when you hang out with rabidly anti-Semitic preachers like Jeremiah Wright, Father Michael Pfleger, and the most infamous of the lot, Louis Farrakhan, who has very close ties to Trinity, the church you attended for 20+ years and to Fr. Pfleger’s St. Sabina church in Chicago (not to mention your campaign guru David Axelrod’s ties to Pfleger et al.).

That’s what happens when your wife, Michelle Obama, appears on and participates in a panel with (and poses for a photograph with) Mother Khadijah Farrakhan, the wife of the anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan. [The PHOTO is re-published at the end of this story. See website listed above]

That’s what happens when your “Faith Outreach” page features the photograph and endorsement of Willie Barrow, a staunch Farrakhan ally who, in 2006, “condemned four members who resigned from the Illinois state Hate Crimes Commission she chairs.”

That’s what happens when you DUCK OUT on a key strategic and political vote — as you did when the Kyl-Lieberman vote came up before the U.S. Senate. Both Hillary Clinton and John McCain “faced the music” — they stood up and were counted. You hid from the vote. Your far-left Daily-Kossack pals were tickled “pink,” but Jewish voters were appalled.

Joe Wilson described the importance of the vote in his op-ed, published here at No Quarter on March 2, 2008:

On Iran and the question of designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization, the junior senator from Illinois was not quite so clever at avoiding taking a position. He first co-sponsored the “Counter-Proliferation Act of 2007,” which contained explicit language identifying the Iranian Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization. He subsequently claimed to oppose the Kyl-Lieberman sense of the Senate resolution proposing the same thing. Obama’s accountability problem here is that he didn’t show up for the vote on that resolution — a vote that would have put him on record. Then he declined to sign on to a letter put forward by Senator Clinton making explicit that the resolution could not be used as authority to take military action. All we have is Obama’s rhetoric juxtaposed with his co-sponsorship of a piece of legislation that proposed what he says he opposed.

Obama’s gyrations on Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran are not the actions of one imbued with superior intuitive judgment, but rather the machinations of a political opportunist looking to avoid having his fingerprints on any issue that might be controversial, and require real judgment, while preserving his freedom to bludgeon his adversary for actually taking positions as elected office demands. It is hard to discern whether Senator Obama is a man of principle, but it is clear that he is not a man of substance. And that judgment, based on his hollow record, is inescapable.

That is worth reading again:

“Obama’s gyrations on Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran are not the actions of one imbued with superior intuitive judgment, but rather the machinations of a political opportunist looking to avoid having his fingerprints on any issue that might be controversial, and require real judgment, while preserving his freedom to bludgeon his adversary for actually taking positions as elected office demands.”

And again, this too:

“It is hard to discern whether Senator Obama is a man of principle, but it is clear that he is not a man of substance. And that judgment, based on his hollow record, is inescapable.”

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-11 01:08:02

Watch the Democratic party become cash-starved from the disappearance of many of its Jewish donors as a result of it selecting an anti-semitic candidate.

Comment by Shoshanah | 2008-06-11 01:18:25

We are two Jews (my husband and me), strong Hillary supporters, who will never vote for Obama. Our reasons are many, but high on the list is the fact that he had no problem sitting in a church for 20 years where anti-Semitic garbage was being spewed.

In November, if Hillary is not the Democratic nominee, we’re voting for McCain.

Comment by The Real Hope | 2008-06-11 01:28:17

I am also Jewish and will never vote for BO. On the other hand, I received an email last night from Jewish friends proudly promoting him. Go figure.

He’s a Muslim by blood. He can yack all he wants about his Christian faith, yada yada, but he secretly wishes to follow in his Muslim father’s footsteps.

Again: a heartless amphibian slithering through the fetid cold waters of political ambition.

Comment by John House | 2008-06-11 02:12:15

Secretly? If anyone read his first book, they’d know that he was in love with his father’s legacy/African roots, despite Obama Sr. being a polygamist (who liked having a nice white woman as a wife, but also liked having a beautiful African Queen on the side as well) and drunkard. And Obama’s grandfather and middle-namesake Hussein is the one who said that he disapproved of Barack Sr. and Stanley Ann’s marriage because he didn’t want a white woman sullying Obama blood. IT’S IN THE BOOK. HOW is THAT not racist and HOW are people missing this???

Comment by cc | 2008-06-11 06:34:09

exactly…Obama himself, in his book, says he despises the white blood that courses through his veins.

Comment by Judith | 2008-06-11 08:36:53

But he has no problem with the white blood who support him. He is scary, scary.

Go to the Hillary Clinton Forum on the web or to http://www.chicagoagainstobama.com….they have copies of what is coming off of Obama web site…show it to your friends. Obama is the second coming of Hitler as far as I am concerned….only I am not the only one that thinks it.

Comment by Nobamber | 2008-06-11 08:05:57

Obama sounds like a budding Adolph Hitler.

He certainly has used jack-booted, brown shirted Obamabots to beat up the “fair and honest” blogs online that would not kiss his feet.

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-11 10:10:38

I will sum up by saying I concur with the observation that Obama is a capital R Racist with an anti semitic bent.

Thank God McCain is not a typical hard line Republican.

Hillary would have been the best, but McCain is an easy second choice for POTUS vs Obama.

Comment by cc | 2008-06-11 06:36:58

the dnc will get NOTHING from me. my money is now going to mccain, already started contributing.

Comment by Anee | 2008-06-11 08:49:38

I am with you all the way, I sent emails to Dean and Boxer and told them my money keeps going to McCain until they change their minds and put Clinton on top of the democratic ticket.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-06-11 01:22:39

The Jews know where Obama stands..
The 57 states of Islam. This was no mistake by Obama. He was tired and the truth of his real alliances were exposed for all to see.
If I was Jewish with relatives in Israel I would be petrified of Obama.
Wait a minute..I’m petrified of him anyway!

Comment by karen for Clinton | 2008-06-11 05:30:19

When I was researching all the candidates to decide who to support I wrote emails to friends with links to many Chicago paper archive stories about Obama and concluded - “This guy scares the CRAP outta me.” A few months later that fear intensified when it became obvious there was not only the usual vast right wing conspiracy but also a far left wing one.

The Dems have chosen to become “Obamacrats” and have alienated huge segments of the former party.

Every time he opens his mouth and every time the DNC continues to railroad her out as if she does not exist they are slowly becoming -

“The party formerly known as the Democratic Party”

They might as well shorten it to the symbol “O”

Do you suppose they are a tad worried by him yet?

Was it all irrational Clinton hatred rather than Obama trust? Let the buyer beware, caveat emptor.

Comment by Micahel | 2008-06-11 01:46:27

In his book he wrote he would take the side of Islam, stand with the Muslims. This is the Islam that says the Jew and Christian is to be fought until they acknowledge the superiority of the Muslim master and are in a state of subjection (Koran 9:29). The Hindus fare even worse.

Comment by DJ | 2008-06-11 02:10:23

There is alot of questions going around the web about Obama’s birth certificate…I have seen on two different posting that he doesn’t want it out there as it says he is Arabic…also there is a question as to if he is even eligible to run for president…anyone know why he won’t release it?

Comment by Mr. X | 2008-06-11 02:12:23

I just have a feeling that Obama’s campaign will fall apart under its own weight. Before, Hillary would always do the first move and Obama could just copy her answers and policies. But now that he’s on his own, he doesn’t seem to be able to make a single correct decision. And the GOP are still waiting for him to be the official nominee before they bring out the heavy artillery. I don’t know if there’ll be anything left by then.

Comment by Darryl | 2008-06-11 02:40:02

check this out, someone tell me if this is true.

“Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between “December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: “…If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.” Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen and Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai’i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama’s birth, but *after* age 16. It doesn’t matter *after* . In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship.
[…]
*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. *** Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. Citzen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16. Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia. Now you can see why Obama’s aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery. This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. Election law. I think the Gov. Of California would be very insterested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. Citizen, and it would set precedence. Stay tuned to your TV sets because I suspect some of this information will be leaking through over the next several days…”

This sounds like a really proven comment, they even list details and laws.
…..http://www.dakotavoice.com/2008/06/whats-this-about-obamas-birth.html……
…..

Well, this is just a taste of the posts so far from today, the 11^th of June 2008. It’s getting very interesting out there in the political world…