More On The Current Obamanation...

Barack Obama Condones Coordinated Internet Harassment by his Thugs

By Uppity WomancloseAuthor: Uppity Woman Name: Uppity Woman
Email: susanunpc@gmail.com
Site: http://hyper-educated-uppity-woman.blogspot.com
About: See Authors Posts (52) on June 12, 2008 at 9:39 AM

First, I need to direct you to this entry at Rezko Watch, so that you will understand that the systematic internet abuse of people who do not support Barack Obama is planned by the Barack Obama campaign with the blessings of the Plastic Jesus Himself. You will read about the “Echo Chamber” to be created on the internet, managed by the same man who led Howard Dean’s internet onslaught. You will also read about how the Plan includes media manipulation. Actually, the entire “plan” is practically Orwellian.

That’s right folks, Howard Dean and Barky Obama are in each other’s pants, so to speak, and have been from Day One. Hillary Clinton never had a chance with the DNC. Nobody would have had a chance. The voters had no chance. The Plan was to put Howard Dean’s candidate, Barack Obama, in the candidate’s slot at all and any costs. Judging from what we have seen in the past year, this is not so hard to believe at all.

The idea here is to turn the internet into a constant Pro Obama “echo”. This includes going where people who do not support Obama are. It also included driving all Hillary supporters away from presumably “objective” sites until the sites become All Obama All The Time.

The most recent example of Obama-Planned onslaught was seen Sunday, when many established bloggers’ and message board users’ names and their links (including my own) were nearly simultaneously forged in messages on forums and blogs all over the net. The messages, falsely bearing our names, stated that we have had a “change of heart” and now “support Barack Obama”.

Knowing fully well that this entire onslaught was a forgery, the gleefully Obama-Complicit Andrew Sullivan posted this entry using a message out of context from a No Quarter thread. Sullivan used the term the Clinton “Dead Enders“. The idea here is to make his readers believe that these forgeries were real, that we have all truly had a change of heart, and the few remaining “dead enders” are in a panic over it.

Andrew Sullivan knows damned well that these messages in our names were forgeries designed by Obama’s campaign. The fact is, a NQ user was seeing all those forgeries on the net and was perplexed. As a deliberate participant of the Obama-coordinated effort, Sullivan used that message to imply those of us whose identities were stolen had actually written those messages.

Not only did Sullivan’s out of context message give a false signal that so many of the No-Obama people were defecting, but suddenly his term “Dead Ender” started showing up on message boards as part of the Obama zombies’ posts to Clinton supporters. Like magic! See? Hopey Changey Magic! No Quarter does a more complete piece on this story here.

We have long noticed that Obamazoids seem to use the same catch phrases, insults and barbs. Now we can clearly see where it is all it coming from: It is coordinated directly with the Barack Obama Campaign.

Look for the words “Dead Enders” to be used often this week, just as Andrew Sullivan used it. I have already seen it used at No Quarter, so it’s coming to the other theaters soon.

The Obama Web Echo Chamber also explains how it is that the sudden rash of forged Obama-Love messages bearing familiar users’ and bloggers names, were posted so widely on the internet so quickly. Inside of 24 hours, all the most used No-Obama websites had been affected, leaving readers confused and thinking that the community of bloggers who have no use for Barack Obama had a change of heart. That was the idea. But this was no instant idea. This wasn’t the impromptu work of a couple of kids in the middle of the night. This was planned.

Barack Obama owns the internet slaughter we have tolerated for more than a year, folks.

This man and his campaign has no interest whatsoever in the concept of Democracy. In the same way he has stolen delegates at caucuses and right In The Face of Michigan voters, this power-hungry man continues to unleash his his young zombies and will stop at nothing to force himself upon America and silence dissent. Frankly, I can see why his cousin Odinga has no problem killing off people who didn’t vote for him in Kenya. Silencing dissent is in his genes.

Barack Obama can’t kill those of us who will never support him like Cousin Odinga is doing, so instead he is working deliberately to kill our spirit, our dignity, our status as human beings, and our Choice of President. Remember, this is the same man who eliminated all of his competition when he ran for State Senate.

Honestly and truly, he is the most vile Presidential candidate I have witnessed in my entire not so short life, and that even includes George Bush. Now that’s amazing! His manipulation of the internet and his ability to bring out the malicious side of young people bear witness to what he is. His sponsors and affiliations bear even greater witness. Show me who you hang out with and I will tell you what you are.

After you have digested Rezko Watch’s piece and No Quarter’s piece, here is what I would like you to do:

Print out the most vile, insulting and filthy messages that you find here or anywhere on the internet. Show them to your friends and relatives. Take the worst ones. Show them to anyone and everyone. For example, show every Jew you know the screen shots from mybarackobama, which depict very clearly what this campaign really thinks of Jews and Israel. The pages have been scrubbed now, and screen shots have become the friend of everyone who opposes Barack Obama.

Truly, gang there is something to offend everyone that has been crapped out by an Obama ass on the internet. Make your printer your friend. Send links to everyone you know. Show them who and what Barack Obama is.

The Obama thugs online don’t even remember that there is a world away from their computers. They are mostly kids who are using the computer while their parents sleep or work. That’s YOUR world. Most people in the real world don’t even know who DK*s is. It’s a community unto itself. The majority of the country couldn’t care less about him or anybody’s blog for that matter.

Use the Real World to stop Obama. I can attest that it works! If Barack Obama wants to be malicious online via his “Echo” surrogates, then he will have to understand that his surrogates represent him. Use his own tool against him.

FROM: http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/12/barack-obama-condones-coordinated-internet-harassment-by-his-thugs/

Michelle Obama Taking On "Whitey"?

Michelle Obama and Louis Farrakhan Take On Whitey

By Larry JohnsoncloseAuthor: Larry Johnson Name: Larry Johnson
Email: larry_johnson@earthlink.net
Site: http://NoQuarterUSA.net
About: Larry C. Johnson is CEO and co-founder of BERG Associates, LLC, an international business-consulting firm with expertise combating terrorism and investigating money laundering. Mr. Johnson works with US military commands in scripting terrorism exercises, briefs on terrorist trends, and conducts undercover investigations on counterfeiting, smuggling and money laundering. Mr. Johnson, who worked previously with the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, is a recognized expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, crisis and risk management. Mr. Johnson has analyzed terrorist incidents for a variety of media including the Jim Lehrer News Hour, National Public Radio, ABC's Nightline, NBC's Today Show, the New York Times, CNN, Fox News, and the BBC. Mr. Johnson has authored several articles for publications, including Security Management Magazine, the New York Times, and The Los Angeles Times. He has lectured on terrorism and aviation security around the world, including the Center for Research and Strategic Studies at the Ecole Polytechnique in Paris, France. He represented the U.S. Government at the July 1996 OSCE Terrorism Conference in Vienna, Austria. From 1989 until October 1993, Larry Johnson served as a Deputy Director in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism. He managed crisis response operations for terrorist incidents throughout the world and he helped organize and direct the US Government’s debriefing of US citizens held in Kuwait and Iraq, which provided vital intelligence on Iraqi operations following the 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Mr. Johnson also participated in the investigation of the terrorist bombing of Pan Am 103. Under Mr. Johnson’s leadership the U.S. airlines and pilots agreed to match the US Government’s two million-dollar reward. From 1985 through September 1989 Mr. Johnson worked for the Central Intelligence Agency. During his distinguished career, he received training in paramilitary operations, worked in the Directorate of Operations, served in the CIA’s Operation’s Center, and established himself as a prolific analyst in the Directorate of Intelligence. In his final year with the CIA he received two Exceptional Performance Awards. Mr. Johnson is a member of the American Society for Industrial Security. He taught at The American University’s School of International Service (1979-1983) while working on a Ph.D. in political science. He has a M.S. degree in Community Development from the University of Missouri (1978), where he also received his B.S. degree in Sociology, graduating Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa in 1976.See Authors Posts (651) on June 2, 2008 at 7:43 AM

I learned over the weekend why the Republicans who have seen the tape of Michelle Obama ranting about “whitey” describe it as “STUNNING.” I have not seen it but I have heard from five separate sources who have spoken directly with people who have seen the tape. It features Michelle Obama and Louis Farrakhan. They are sitting on a panel at Jeremiah Wright’s Church when Michelle makes her intemperate remarks. Whoops!! When that image comes out it will enter the politcal ads hall of fame. It will be right up there with the little girl plucking daisy petals in the famous 1964 ad LBJ used against Barry Goldwater.

Barack may have quit his church but his religious problems are not over. Barack Obama has a Nation of Islam problem that will receive more attention in the coming days. Before Barack came on the scene, THE MAN in his political district was Louis Farrakhan. No one could take Alice Palmer’s seat without Farrakhan’s blessing. No one. I do not fault Barack Obama for seeking out the blessing of Farrakhan, but the story of what was done behind the scenes to get rid of Barack’s predecessor—Alice Palmer—has not been told. A knowledgeable source tells me that Tony Rezko played a direct role in this feat. And Rezko has been tight with Farrakhan.

It also should come as no surprise that Barack hired two members of the Nation of Islam to work on his staff—Jennifer Mason and Cynthia K. Miller. (And no, I am not merely recycling info initially reported by Debbie Schlussel. I have two independent Chicago sources for this info.) If Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger had kept their yaps buttoned none of this would mean much. But the fact that both men have been—until scrubbed from the website in recent weeks—listed as spiritual advisors to Barack Obama and also are very close to Louis Farrakhan, forces the question about Barack’s faith and beliefs.

In probing those matters we begin to understand that the Nation of Islam has been a critical component of Barack Obama’s base of support. And, I am told, Louis Farrakhan has been careful to use Tony Rezko as the intermediary in his relationship with Barack. This is not guilt by association, this is guilt because of actual relationship. Farrakhan, Wright, and Pfleger are each on tape in various settings spewing the most vile racists garbage in the guise of preaching. Barack Obama, up to this point, has tried to pretend he had no idea that these men had these thoughts or said these things.

NONSENSE!! He knew and he knows. And the gig will be up when the Michelle tape hits the airwaves. One source described how this tape was acquired. Let’s just say that one of the republican candidates who is no longer in the race, but had a dandy oppo research capability, uncovered this gem. If Republican poohbahs have their way the tape will remain on ice until October. But when it comes out, Barack will be permanently branded with the Nation of Islam. That’s not a winning platform in November. And Barack’s bundlers understand this threat. I also have learned some major financial backers are asking the Barack team about the tape and are being stonewalled. It is a wild card in the political campaign that has not yet played out.

And Away They Go...

Elite Jewish Democratic Donors Are Flocking to John McCain

The following comments are taken from the website: http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/11/hot-elite-jewish-democratic-donors-flocking-to-mccain/

From The Hill, “Jewish Dem donor joins McCain team“:

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is attracting elite Jewish Democratic donors who backed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and are concerned about Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) stance toward Israel, say McCain backers who are organizing the effort to court Democrats.

McCain has already had several fundraising events with Jewish Democrats in Washington and Florida, say his supporters. …

You see, Senator Obama, that’s what happens when you hang out with rabidly anti-Semitic preachers like Jeremiah Wright, Father Michael Pfleger, and the most infamous of the lot, Louis Farrakhan, who has very close ties to Trinity, the church you attended for 20+ years and to Fr. Pfleger’s St. Sabina church in Chicago (not to mention your campaign guru David Axelrod’s ties to Pfleger et al.).

That’s what happens when your wife, Michelle Obama, appears on and participates in a panel with (and poses for a photograph with) Mother Khadijah Farrakhan, the wife of the anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan. [The PHOTO is re-published at the end of this story. See website listed above]

That’s what happens when your “Faith Outreach” page features the photograph and endorsement of Willie Barrow, a staunch Farrakhan ally who, in 2006, “condemned four members who resigned from the Illinois state Hate Crimes Commission she chairs.”

That’s what happens when you DUCK OUT on a key strategic and political vote — as you did when the Kyl-Lieberman vote came up before the U.S. Senate. Both Hillary Clinton and John McCain “faced the music” — they stood up and were counted. You hid from the vote. Your far-left Daily-Kossack pals were tickled “pink,” but Jewish voters were appalled.

Joe Wilson described the importance of the vote in his op-ed, published here at No Quarter on March 2, 2008:

On Iran and the question of designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization, the junior senator from Illinois was not quite so clever at avoiding taking a position. He first co-sponsored the “Counter-Proliferation Act of 2007,” which contained explicit language identifying the Iranian Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization. He subsequently claimed to oppose the Kyl-Lieberman sense of the Senate resolution proposing the same thing. Obama’s accountability problem here is that he didn’t show up for the vote on that resolution — a vote that would have put him on record. Then he declined to sign on to a letter put forward by Senator Clinton making explicit that the resolution could not be used as authority to take military action. All we have is Obama’s rhetoric juxtaposed with his co-sponsorship of a piece of legislation that proposed what he says he opposed.

Obama’s gyrations on Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran are not the actions of one imbued with superior intuitive judgment, but rather the machinations of a political opportunist looking to avoid having his fingerprints on any issue that might be controversial, and require real judgment, while preserving his freedom to bludgeon his adversary for actually taking positions as elected office demands. It is hard to discern whether Senator Obama is a man of principle, but it is clear that he is not a man of substance. And that judgment, based on his hollow record, is inescapable.

That is worth reading again:

“Obama’s gyrations on Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran are not the actions of one imbued with superior intuitive judgment, but rather the machinations of a political opportunist looking to avoid having his fingerprints on any issue that might be controversial, and require real judgment, while preserving his freedom to bludgeon his adversary for actually taking positions as elected office demands.”

And again, this too:

“It is hard to discern whether Senator Obama is a man of principle, but it is clear that he is not a man of substance. And that judgment, based on his hollow record, is inescapable.”

Comment by Joe | 2008-06-11 01:08:02

Watch the Democratic party become cash-starved from the disappearance of many of its Jewish donors as a result of it selecting an anti-semitic candidate.

Comment by Shoshanah | 2008-06-11 01:18:25

We are two Jews (my husband and me), strong Hillary supporters, who will never vote for Obama. Our reasons are many, but high on the list is the fact that he had no problem sitting in a church for 20 years where anti-Semitic garbage was being spewed.

In November, if Hillary is not the Democratic nominee, we’re voting for McCain.

Comment by The Real Hope | 2008-06-11 01:28:17

I am also Jewish and will never vote for BO. On the other hand, I received an email last night from Jewish friends proudly promoting him. Go figure.

He’s a Muslim by blood. He can yack all he wants about his Christian faith, yada yada, but he secretly wishes to follow in his Muslim father’s footsteps.

Again: a heartless amphibian slithering through the fetid cold waters of political ambition.

Comment by John House | 2008-06-11 02:12:15

Secretly? If anyone read his first book, they’d know that he was in love with his father’s legacy/African roots, despite Obama Sr. being a polygamist (who liked having a nice white woman as a wife, but also liked having a beautiful African Queen on the side as well) and drunkard. And Obama’s grandfather and middle-namesake Hussein is the one who said that he disapproved of Barack Sr. and Stanley Ann’s marriage because he didn’t want a white woman sullying Obama blood. IT’S IN THE BOOK. HOW is THAT not racist and HOW are people missing this???

Comment by cc | 2008-06-11 06:34:09

exactly…Obama himself, in his book, says he despises the white blood that courses through his veins.

Comment by Judith | 2008-06-11 08:36:53

But he has no problem with the white blood who support him. He is scary, scary.

Go to the Hillary Clinton Forum on the web or to http://www.chicagoagainstobama.com….they have copies of what is coming off of Obama web site…show it to your friends. Obama is the second coming of Hitler as far as I am concerned….only I am not the only one that thinks it.

Comment by Nobamber | 2008-06-11 08:05:57

Obama sounds like a budding Adolph Hitler.

He certainly has used jack-booted, brown shirted Obamabots to beat up the “fair and honest” blogs online that would not kiss his feet.

Comment by Johnny at Work | 2008-06-11 10:10:38

I will sum up by saying I concur with the observation that Obama is a capital R Racist with an anti semitic bent.

Thank God McCain is not a typical hard line Republican.

Hillary would have been the best, but McCain is an easy second choice for POTUS vs Obama.

Comment by cc | 2008-06-11 06:36:58

the dnc will get NOTHING from me. my money is now going to mccain, already started contributing.

Comment by Anee | 2008-06-11 08:49:38

I am with you all the way, I sent emails to Dean and Boxer and told them my money keeps going to McCain until they change their minds and put Clinton on top of the democratic ticket.

Comment by Seattle Moss | 2008-06-11 01:22:39

The Jews know where Obama stands..
The 57 states of Islam. This was no mistake by Obama. He was tired and the truth of his real alliances were exposed for all to see.
If I was Jewish with relatives in Israel I would be petrified of Obama.
Wait a minute..I’m petrified of him anyway!

Comment by karen for Clinton | 2008-06-11 05:30:19

When I was researching all the candidates to decide who to support I wrote emails to friends with links to many Chicago paper archive stories about Obama and concluded - “This guy scares the CRAP outta me.” A few months later that fear intensified when it became obvious there was not only the usual vast right wing conspiracy but also a far left wing one.

The Dems have chosen to become “Obamacrats” and have alienated huge segments of the former party.

Every time he opens his mouth and every time the DNC continues to railroad her out as if she does not exist they are slowly becoming -

“The party formerly known as the Democratic Party”

They might as well shorten it to the symbol “O”

Do you suppose they are a tad worried by him yet?

Was it all irrational Clinton hatred rather than Obama trust? Let the buyer beware, caveat emptor.

Comment by Micahel | 2008-06-11 01:46:27

In his book he wrote he would take the side of Islam, stand with the Muslims. This is the Islam that says the Jew and Christian is to be fought until they acknowledge the superiority of the Muslim master and are in a state of subjection (Koran 9:29). The Hindus fare even worse.

Comment by DJ | 2008-06-11 02:10:23

There is alot of questions going around the web about Obama’s birth certificate…I have seen on two different posting that he doesn’t want it out there as it says he is Arabic…also there is a question as to if he is even eligible to run for president…anyone know why he won’t release it?

Comment by Mr. X | 2008-06-11 02:12:23

I just have a feeling that Obama’s campaign will fall apart under its own weight. Before, Hillary would always do the first move and Obama could just copy her answers and policies. But now that he’s on his own, he doesn’t seem to be able to make a single correct decision. And the GOP are still waiting for him to be the official nominee before they bring out the heavy artillery. I don’t know if there’ll be anything left by then.

Comment by Darryl | 2008-06-11 02:40:02

check this out, someone tell me if this is true.

“Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between “December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: “…If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.” Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen and Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai’i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama’s birth, but *after* age 16. It doesn’t matter *after* . In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship.
[…]
*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. *** Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. Citzen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16. Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia. Now you can see why Obama’s aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery. This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. Election law. I think the Gov. Of California would be very insterested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. Citizen, and it would set precedence. Stay tuned to your TV sets because I suspect some of this information will be leaking through over the next several days…”

This sounds like a really proven comment, they even list details and laws.
…..http://www.dakotavoice.com/2008/06/whats-this-about-obamas-birth.html……
…..

Well, this is just a taste of the posts so far from today, the 11^th of June 2008. It’s getting very interesting out there in the political world…

Let The Games Begin...

It WILL get nasty!

Some of the recent discussion that can be read at the following site:

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/07/the-great-and-growing-divide/

It begins to show the disarray in the ranks of the Democrats who supported Hillary Clinton and their avid dislike of Barack Obama and his messianic rise in the just finished primaries…

I’ll tell you who I am….

I AM A HILLARY SUPPORTER TURNED JOHN MCCAIN SUPPORTER….

SAY NO TO THE OBAMA ISLAMO-FASCIST, ANTI WHITE, ANTI WOMEN, ANTI INTEGRITY, ANTI HONESTY MACHINE.

I AM SOMEONE WHO DOESN’T SELL HER SOUL FOR THE POLITICAL RHETORIC OF A SMART CAMPAIGNER BY THE NAME OF HILLARY CLINTON.

I BET ANYTHING, THAT NOT EVEN SHE WANTS TO VOTE FOR OBAMA. DID YOU NOTICE THAT SHE DID NOT MENTION JOHN MCCAIN IN HER SPEECH? IT IS A CLUE… DON’T BE A FOOL!

You know things are getting bad in cyberland when the all caps response occurs. And they are getting bad.

Atdnext came to linfar’s defense:

But please, PLEASE, let’s not destroy our nation in the name of “sending a message to the party”. As much as I disagree with the Superdelegates’ decision, they made their decision and we have a nominee. And as imperfect as Obama is, he’s still far better than McCain.

I am not so sure I agree with atdnext. Supporting a racist, elitist, friends with terrorists, out of touch bigot might be just a little more dangerous than supporting a real war hero whose patriotism NO ONE questions. Just maybe.

teese02a decided to say something too:

linfar and andrew sound like they are working for Obama. This group has always been about supporting Hillary. It is the Obama folks who need to leave. Linfar is wrong. You are only stating how you feel, not telling other’s to vote like you.

A provocative statement indeed. It is hard to make the case that supporting Obama is somehow supporting Hillary. When the Obama camp played it’s race card that wasn’t supporting Hillary. When they used blatant sexism that didn’t support her either. And when they used Republican talking points to smear her that definitely did not support Hillary. So just how is it that supporting Obama mysteriously also now means supporting Hillary?

You see, there is one camp that believes that the only way to reform the party is from the inside. And there is another camp entirely that believes that the only way the Democratic party will reform in any manner is if it is defeated soundly in the upcoming election. Call it a nuclear option.

Cam5maccrory well represents the second camp:

Reforming the party from within is wishful thinking. The only way a party reforms is by humiliating defeat, running off the rails, or egregious abuse in the opposition party.

If BO is elected, they will be in charge of the party…in fact are in charge of the party as we speak. Try to go talk to them about reform. Go talk to them about counting every vote…about changing the caucus system to transparent primaries. Tell them how you feel about it. I think we all know what the attitude will be.

For me…my only recourse is to withhold my support from the current party leadership and the BO party leadership. It’s a drop in the bucket but I don’t feel like I will be complicit in Republican style tactics…even if they worked.

Ronmaven echoed the sentiment and clarified it:

The defeat of Obama would be the best kick in the pants for the DNC we could possibly deliver. You want to CHANGE the party? Vote for McCain. You want the party to only get worse? Vote for O.

To some, NOT supporting Obama is the moral thing to do. Ccwarrior perhaps says it best:

easy decision for me I will sellout the party that SOLD me out. and I can live with that. I would never dis-respect my daughters, and vote for Obama after the treatment they witnessed from him doing this election …NEVER

But I have saved the best for last. Before I put it out there I want to make one thing very clear. I have nothing but the deepest respect for linfar. She has been a staunch Hillary supporter and she is such an excellent writer. I just happen to totally disagree with her about Obama and unfortunately may have to write things in the future that criticize her positions. It isn’t something I look forward to.

But having said that I think that unfortunately linfar grabbed a mug full of the Cult-Aide today because low and behold, she quotes from none other than the Prince of Darkness himself (Jonathan Singer) to make her point.

from mydd

Singer: Can you speak to the online supporters, the people online who are so strong for Hillary, who don’t want to see her leave, as a strong Hillary supporter yourself?

Sen. Chuck Schumer: As a strong Hillary support I say, look, I was for Hillary all the way. I was sort of the first Senator to endorse her and I guess I’ll be the last off the bandwagon, which I guess will be tomorrow. But, having said that, I would say to all of the people online, there’s too much at stake to sit this out, to be angry, to be bitter. There is too much at stake. A Supreme Court with more Alitos and Roberts. A continuation of the war in Iraq.

A failure to have a healthcare policy that helps people. A failure to have an energy policy that frees us from foreign oil. All these are such huge things that we have to do what Hillary said there, which
is overcome, not look back, even though there are lot’s of disappointments, but look forward.

I expected these bugaboos coming from Schumer. But a little reality never hurt anyone. Except Cultists I’m told. We hear the same nonsense you would expect from otherwise seemingly reasonable people. The trouble is that they think they will be able to bamboozle and scare us with their line of bullshit.

Everything Schumer mentions is something that the Congress controls, not the President. Supreme Court… confirmed by the Senate. Iraq War funding…. controlled by Congress. Health Care policy…. written by Congress. Energy policy… written by Congress.

SO WAKE UP! And stop letting these people get away with lying to you.

Yeah… It sure is going to be an interesting campaign season coming up…!!

Don’t forget to watch this on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmwBtPoBdRU

A Season Of Race Baiting?

Will the Race Card Continue to Trump Issues?

By LisaBcloseAuthor: LisaB Name: Lisa B
Email: susanunpc@gmail.com
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (12) on June 6, 2008 at 10:42 AM

In the end, the Democratic primary seemed to revolve around race, race-baiting and labeling. Anyone not for Barack Obama is a racist and anyone for anyone else is a racist. Entire groups of people were labeled and discussed and dissected as to the virulence of their supposed racism.

Of course, by the time West Virginia, Kentucky and Puerto Rico voted, there were several valid questions about BO’s church, his attendance there for 20 years and the juvenile, unintelligent rantings by various “leaders” Obama claimed as “spiritual advisors.” No matter though. These people who voted for someone else must have been racist. Nothing else explains it. It’s not as if these voters were insulted and ignored. Oh wait, they were - oh snap. Well, they should have understood their limitations and understood that despite what their lying eyes and ears were telling them, Obama really cares about them and their issues. Heh.

Well, the primaries are done and now the presumptive Democratic nominee will face the RNC machine. This should be interesting for many reasons, but will the BO campaign try to slap down the race card in this match-up? How will the campaign play it? Will it be through surrogates, Michelle, bloggers, print or tv? Or some other way?

In today’s Wall Street Journal, Juan Williams has an op-ed piece suggesting the Obama campaign put away the race card. Williams talks about Wright, Pfleger, that “amazing” speech when Obama said he could not “disown” Wright and what Obama now needs to do. Williams actually says perhaps OBAMA should give another speech and:

admit to sins of using race for political expediency – by knowingly buying into divisive, mean messages being delivered from the pulpit.

Williams calls Obama out, gently, for use of the race card. But is anyone listening? Somehow, given Obama’s resume, I think the card is still in play. What else has he got, after all?

To deal with this controversy effectively, Mr. Obama needs to give another speech. This time he has to admit to sins of using race for political expediency – by knowingly buying into divisive, mean messages being delivered from the pulpit. He has to say that, as a biracial young man with no community roots, attaching himself to Rev. Wright and the Trinity congregation was a shortcut to move up the ladder in the Chicago political scene. He has to call race-baiting what it is, whether it comes from a pulpit or calls itself progressive politics. And he has to challenge his supporters, especially his black base, to be honest about real problems at the heart of today’s racial divide – including out-of-wedlock births, crime, drugs and a culture that devalues education while glorifying the gangster life.

Mr. Obama also has to raise the bar for how political criticism is handled in his camp. Step one is to acknowledge that not every critic is a racist. His very liberal record and his limited experience, like his association with Rev. Wright, is a fact, not the work of white racists. Just as he calls for the GOP not to engage in the politics of fear over terrorism, Mr. Obama needs to declare that he will refrain from playing the racial victim, because he understands such tactics will paralyze political debate and damage race relations.

Found online at:

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/06/will-the-race-card-continue-to-trump-issues/#comment-323068

Juan Williams’ Article:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121270934203350365.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

A Big Problem For Democrats?

From a recent posting on the internet…

What Some Democrats Now Say…

There are winds blowing in a direction that just a few short months ago would have seemed inconceivable. These winds have picked up strength in the last few weeks and are now even beginning to be felt by some Republican strategists. There is no sign that these winds will die down anytime soon, and the growing consensus among some is that the winds will only grow in intensity and strength until Election day.

I am talking about the anti-Obama Movement that has swept the Republican Party, and is now taking root in the non-elite sectors of the Democratic Party - particularly the pro-Hillary Clinton forces.

As I have written before, the Hillary forces are mad as heck and are refusing to fall quietly in line behind Obama because they believe the Obama campaign, many of his supporters, and many pro-Obama news organizations have been overtly sexist toward them and their candidate, believe Obama has run an unfair, race-baiting, nasty campaign against their candidate, believe Obama is woefully inexperienced to become POTUS, believe Obama hasn’t previously demonstrated a record of bringing Republicans and Democrats and blacks and whites together, believe Obama has associated himself with too many unsavory characters, and firmly believe that he is a danger to the future of not only the Democratic party, but to the United States of America, too. For these reasons and more they say that they will not only reject the “anointing” of Obama by the ”in the tank” news media and the DNC, but are threatening to actually vote - and even campaign - for John McCain. They further state that this is the only way that they can wrest their party back from the elites so that the Democratic Party can once again be Democratic, and once again be a fighter for the “working class” people of America.

These Democrats blame the likes of DNC Chairman Howard Dean and superdelegate Donna Brazile among other elites of their party for the choices they now feel they will have to make in order to retrieve their beloved party back from the radical leftists who have taken it over.

Consider the following excerpts from a Democrat site called, ‘No Quarter’ in a post called, “Not now, not ever - A repudiation of Obama and the New Bolsheviks and an Interesting Possibility” copied from another Democrat site called, ‘The Heraclitan Fire.’

“Several scenarios suggest themselves when reviewing the previous information. They all have one thing in common; the Democratic Party will not survive this election. I was stunned when I realized this, I had assumed that the Republican party was about to disintegrate into its natural constituencies…but it now appears that the Democrats are going to beat them to it…If Clinton is denied the nomination by the New Bolsheviks with the support of the power-ghoul party secretariat, the Democrats can count on a huge proportion of the Clinton constituency turning their backs and exiting the party. I know that most of the professional political corps pooh-poohs this as fire-breathing partisan hype but I have witnessed a level of fury about this that is absolutely unprecedented in all my political experience. This is not hot-blooded, blowhard posturing, this is cold, hard, grim resolve – and I’m seeing it from all quarters – it’s very, very real. And it means that Obama doesn’t have a snowball’s chance of winning in the fall…”

And the following excerpt from ‘Liberal Rapture’ entitled, “Just Walk.”

“Dean and Donna Brazille have destroyed the Democratic Party. There can be no ‘healing process’ because what Dean and Brazille have done is not a ‘wound’. It is a robbery. We need a justice process. Not a healing process. Please understand this one fact: If Obama is the nominee he will have been awarded it with a minority of Democratic votes and an elite cabal. That fact is the alpha and omega.”

“I know I won’t vote for Obama in November. I know I might vote for McCain. And I know I am at peace with it. I know the GOP will pull out all the stops to defeat Obama and I know I will support whatever they legally do. Obama is a dangerous fraud. We need at least 2 parties in this nation. Right now we only have one: The GOP. The Democratic Party is in full melt down. Fine. Justice should be served. If we, the majority members of the Democratic Party will not have our candidate nominated because a minority cabal gamed the system then we can do one thing: WALK. Walk any direction you like. Just WALK.”

And these two excerpts from an article entitled, “Barack Obama and the Unmaking of the Democrat Party” from ‘The Huffington Post.’

“Without a majority of those voters, the Democrats have, since the party’s inception in the 1820s, been incapable of winning the presidency. The Obama advocates declare, though, that we have entered an entirely new political era. It is not only possible but also desirable, they say, for Democrats to win by turning away from those whom “progressive” pundits and bloggers disdain variously as “Nascar man,” “uneducated,” “low information” whites, “rubes, fools, and hate-mongers” who live in the nation’s “shitholes.”

“In every presidential election they have won, the Democrats have solidified their historic link to white workers, not dismissed them. Obama and the champions of a new party coalition appear to think that everything has suddenly changed, simply because of the force of their own desires. In any event, Obama had shown no ability thus far to attract the one constituency that has always spelled the difference between victory and defeat for the Democratic Party. The party must now decide whether to go along with Obama and renounce its own heritage — and tempt the political fates.”

And these two excerpts from an article entitled, “Democrats Look Back in Anger” from ‘The Patriot Room.’

“As things stand now, Barack Obama is lining himself up to be yet another failed DNC attempt at reclaiming the White House. There is simply too much anger within the party for him to even secure a solid blue state victory.”

“By attempting to play kingmaker for their man Barack Obama, the mainstream media and half of Washington have attempted to destroy the Clintons. In final analysis, they will succeed only in destroying both candidates. Sadly, many in Washington and the mainstream media, whether through greed or vanity, don’t have the intellectual fortitude to see the destruction of their party in the making.”

And these two excerpts from an article entitled, “It’s Official: The LEMMINGCRAT Part Begins” by ‘NO Quarter.’

“I wonder if these numbskulls have thought this thing through. The most recent polls suggest that at least 40% of the current Hillary supporters will not vote for Obama under any circumstance. Do Howard Dean and Donna Brazile think it is in the best interests of the Democratic party to have nearly 25% of registered Democrats voting for a Republican candidate? Do they honestly believe that Obama’s appeal with Independents and Republicans can make up for our defection? Or rather, their defection from the democratic process.”

“So to Howard Dean and Donna Brazile and Barack Obama I only have this one thing to say. You have alienated many people during this campaign season. And many, if not most of us will never forgive you. And a strong percentage of us are going to actively work against you. So I HOPE you are happy with what you have created. The only good news to any of this is that you will be taking your cult off the cliff with you.”

And finally, these three excerpts from an article entitled, “To the Hillary campaign” from NO QUARTER.

“I have been a lifelong Democrat and as such I can say that I have never been truly represented (I came to like Bill but I disagreed with a lot of his more conservative initiatives).”

“This time, however, it’s different. I have been appalled by the spinelessness of the Democrats in the 110th Congress and even more aghast at the candidacy of Senator Obama (see my journal for a more detailed look at this).”

“If Obama is nominated I will not support him, even if Hillary is on the ticket with him. In addition, I will leave the Democratic Party and, if it looks like a close election in the Fall… I will hold my nose and vote for McCain. Well, you may say, what’s one disaffected voter among millions? I urge you not to dismiss this lightly, I have come to find that there are many, many people who feel this way - we will not be coming together to get behind the party nominee, not this time.”

These are just a small sample of examples of Democrats being fed up with a party that they feel is simply not listening to them. They are angry, and are convinced that the only way they are truly going to be heard is to defeat him and his most egregious elite supporters so that they can reclaim their party once again, and thus become proud once again to be called Democrats.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmwBtPoBdRU